Baruch Studio

fin-3610 · Options and special topics

Financial Options: Calls and Puts

Payoff and profit diagrams for European calls and puts; put-call parity as a no-arbitrage relation; intrinsic value vs time value; binomial pricing intuition.

⏱ 25 min Tags: fin-3610, Berk-DeMarzo Ch 20, options, call, put

Learning objectives

  • Draw payoff diagrams for long and short calls and puts.
  • State and apply put-call parity.
  • Price a one-period option in a two-state binomial model via replication.

Two contracts, four positions

A call option gives the holder the right (not obligation) to buy the underlying asset at a fixed strike price KK on or before expiration TT.

A put option gives the holder the right to sell the underlying at strike KK on or before TT.

For each contract you can be long (the buyer/holder, who paid the premium) or short (the seller/writer, who collected the premium). Four positions total.

This lesson assumes European options (exercisable only at TT). American options (exercisable any time before TT) follow the same structure with one extra wrinkle.

Payoff diagrams

Let STS_T be the stock price at expiration. Payoff at expiration:

PositionPayoff
Long callmax(STK,0)\max(S_T - K, 0)
Short callmax(STK,0)-\max(S_T - K, 0)
Long putmax(KST,0)\max(K - S_T, 0)
Short putmax(KST,0)-\max(K - S_T, 0)

Sketch on a (ST,payoff)(S_T, \text{payoff}) axis:

  • Long call: zero for ST<KS_T < K, then upward 45° from KK.
  • Long put: downward 45° from KK for ST<KS_T < K, zero for ST>KS_T > K.
  • Short positions are mirror images across the x-axis.

Profit diagram = payoff diagram shifted by the premium paid (or received). A long call with premium $2 and strike $50 breaks even at ST=52S_T = 52.

Put-call parity

For European options on a non-dividend-paying stock:

C+K(1+rf)T=P+S0.C + \frac{K}{(1+r_f)^T} = P + S_0.

Where CC is the call price, PP the put price, S0S_0 current stock price, rfr_f risk-free rate.

Why? The left side: buy a call, save enough cash at the risk- free rate to grow to KK at TT. If ST>KS_T > K, exercise the call: you get the stock for KK, paid with your saved cash. If ST<KS_T < K, let the call expire and keep your KK in cash. Final value: max(ST,K)\max(S_T, K).

The right side: buy a put and the stock. If ST>KS_T > K, the put expires worthless, you have the stock. If ST<KS_T < K, exercise the put to sell the stock for KK. Final value: max(ST,K)\max(S_T, K) — same.

Two portfolios with identical payoffs must have the same cost (Law of One Price). Hence put-call parity.

Example. S_0 = \100,, K = $100,, T = 1year,year,r_f = 5%.Suppose. Suppose C = $8$. Then put price:

P=C+K/(1+rf)TS0=8+100/1.05100=8+95.24100=$3.24.P = C + K/(1+r_f)^T - S_0 = 8 + 100/1.05 - 100 = 8 + 95.24 - 100 = \$3.24.

If the market quotes the put at \5,arbitrageexists:selltheput,buythecall,shortthestock,lend, arbitrage exists: sell the put, buy the call, short the stock, lend $95.24toreceiveto receive$100atatT. Net cash today: \5 - 8 + 100 - 95.24 = $1.76 of riskless profit. Real markets close this kind of mismatch in seconds via high-frequency arbitrage.

Intrinsic value and time value

The price of an option decomposes into:

  • Intrinsic value: payoff if exercised today. max(SK,0)\max(S - K, 0) for a call, max(KS,0)\max(K - S, 0) for a put.
  • Time value: the rest. Reflects the chance the option will be more valuable before expiration (more time = more uncertainty = more upside potential).

Time value is always non-negative. It’s largest at the money (SKS \approx K) and shrinks as expiration approaches (time decay).

Pricing by replication: the binomial model

The cleanest way to see why options have unique prices: build a replicating portfolio.

One-period setup. Today the stock is S0S_0. At time TT it will be either Su=uS0S_u = uS_0 (up state) or Sd=dS0S_d = dS_0 (down state). Risk- free rate is rfr_f. A call with strike KK pays Cu=max(SuK,0)C_u = \max(S_u - K, 0) in the up state and Cd=max(SdK,0)C_d = \max(S_d - K, 0) in the down state.

Build a portfolio of Δ\Delta shares + BB dollars in bonds that exactly replicates the call:

  • Up: ΔSu+B(1+rf)=Cu\Delta \cdot S_u + B(1+r_f) = C_u.
  • Down: ΔSd+B(1+rf)=Cd\Delta \cdot S_d + B(1+r_f) = C_d.

Solve:

Δ=CuCdSuSd,B=CdΔSd1+rf.\Delta = \frac{C_u - C_d}{S_u - S_d}, \quad B = \frac{C_d - \Delta \cdot S_d}{1 + r_f}.

By the Law of One Price, the call must cost:

C0=ΔS0+B.C_0 = \Delta \cdot S_0 + B.

Example. S_0 = \50,, u = 1.2,, d = 0.9,, K = $50,, r_f = 4%$.

  • Su=60S_u = 60, Sd=45S_d = 45, Cu=10C_u = 10, Cd=0C_d = 0.
  • Δ=(100)/(6045)=0.667\Delta = (10 - 0)/(60 - 45) = 0.667.
  • B=(00.667×45)/1.04=30/1.04=28.85B = (0 - 0.667 \times 45)/1.04 = -30/1.04 = -28.85.
  • C_0 = 0.667 \times 50 + (-28.85) = 33.33 - 28.85 = \4.48$.

(Negative BB means borrow.)

Why this matters for corporate finance

Two reasons options matter beyond derivatives trading:

  1. Real options in capital budgeting (next lesson). Many projects have option-like features — defer, expand, abandon — that pure DCF undervalues.
  2. Capital structure as options. Equity in a levered firm is a call option on firm value with strike equal to debt face value. Debt is a risk-free bond minus a put. Merton (1974) built credit-risk models on this insight, and modern banking regulation (Basel) still uses derivatives of it.

For undergraduate corporate finance, you mostly need to recognize option structures and know put-call parity. The Black-Scholes formula is one level deeper than this course goes.

Practice quiz →